Logging

Logging represents the systematic process of recording events, transactions, and activities that occur within software systems, applications, and infrastructure. For DevSecOps leaders and security directors managing complex software development lifecycles, logging serves as the foundational layer for visibility, troubleshooting, security analysis, and compliance requirements. The practice of logging creates permanent records that enable teams to understand what happened in their systems, when it happened, who or what initiated the action, and the resulting outcome. These records become critical artifacts for incident response, audit trails, performance optimization, and threat detection across modern development and production environments.

Every action within your software supply chain generates data—from code commits and build processes to deployment activities and runtime operations. Capturing this information through proper logging mechanisms allows organizations to maintain security posture, meet regulatory requirements, and quickly identify anomalies that could indicate security breaches or operational failures.

‍

What is Logging in Software Development and Security Contexts?

When we talk about logging within software supply chain security and DevSecOps practices, we're referring to the automated capture and storage of event data across the entire development and deployment pipeline. This encompasses everything from developer workstation activities to CI/CD pipeline operations, container runtime events, API transactions, authentication attempts, and infrastructure changes.

The definition of logging extends beyond simple text files containing timestamps and error messages. Modern logging represents a comprehensive data collection strategy that captures structured information about system behavior, user interactions, security events, and business transactions. These log entries contain contextual metadata including severity levels, source identifiers, session information, and environmental context that makes them valuable for multiple use cases.

Logging differs from monitoring in that it focuses on creating permanent records rather than real-time dashboards, though the two practices work together synergistically. While monitoring answers "what is happening right now," logging answers "what happened before" and provides the historical context needed for deep analysis and forensic investigation.

Core Components of Logging Systems

Building effective logging capabilities requires understanding the fundamental components that make up logging infrastructure:

• Log Sources: Applications, services, infrastructure components, security tools, and development platforms that generate log data
• Log Collectors: Agents or services that gather logs from distributed sources and forward them to centralized systems
• Log Aggregation: Centralized platforms that receive, parse, and index log data from multiple sources into searchable repositories
• Log Storage: Databases, object storage, or specialized time-series stores that retain log data for specified retention periods
• Log Analysis: Tools and processes for searching, filtering, correlating, and extracting insights from collected log data
• Log Visualization: Dashboards and interfaces that present log insights in human-readable formats

Types of Logs in DevSecOps Environments

Different log types serve distinct purposes across your software development and security operations:

• Application Logs: Events generated by custom code including errors, warnings, debug information, and business logic execution
• System Logs: Operating system events, resource utilization, kernel messages, and hardware interactions
• Security Logs: Authentication events, authorization decisions, security policy violations, and threat detection alerts
• Audit Logs: Who accessed what resources, when, and what actions they performed—critical for compliance
• Transaction Logs: Business-level events that track workflows, user journeys, and process completions
• Network Logs: Traffic patterns, connection attempts, firewall decisions, and protocol-level communications
• Container Logs: Events from containerized workloads including stdout/stderr streams and orchestration activities
• CI/CD Pipeline Logs: Build processes, test results, deployment activities, and pipeline execution details

‍

Explanation of Logging Levels and Severity Classifications

Effective logging practices categorize events by severity to enable filtering and prioritization. The standard logging levels create a hierarchy that helps teams focus on the most critical issues while maintaining comprehensive records:

• FATAL/CRITICAL: System-threatening failures that require immediate attention and typically result in application termination
• ERROR: Significant problems that prevent specific operations from completing successfully but don't crash the entire system
• WARN: Potentially problematic situations that don't currently prevent functionality but might indicate future issues
• INFO: General informational messages that track normal application flow and important business events
• DEBUG: Detailed technical information useful during development and troubleshooting but too verbose for production environments
• TRACE: Extremely detailed information showing step-by-step execution, typically disabled except during intensive debugging

Properly configuring log levels across environments prevents both under-logging (missing critical information) and over-logging (overwhelming storage and analysis capabilities with noise). Production environments typically run at INFO or WARN levels, while development and staging environments might enable DEBUG or TRACE for troubleshooting.

‍

How to Implement Effective Logging Strategies

Building a logging strategy that supports both security objectives and operational needs requires deliberate planning and architectural decisions. Organizations must balance completeness with practicality, ensuring they capture necessary information without creating unmanageable data volumes or performance impacts.

Establishing Logging Standards and Guidelines

Create organizational standards that define what should be logged, how logs should be formatted, and where they should be sent. These standards ensure consistency across teams and technologies, making correlation and analysis significantly easier. Your logging standards should address:

• Required fields for all log entries (timestamp, service identifier, correlation ID, severity level)
• Structured logging formats (JSON, key-value pairs) rather than unstructured text strings
• Sensitive data handling policies that prevent logging credentials, tokens, PII, or other protected information
• Naming conventions for log sources, event types, and custom fields
• Retention requirements based on data type, regulatory needs, and operational value

Implementing Structured Logging

Structured logging formats log entries as parseable data objects rather than free-form text. This approach dramatically improves searchability, enables automated parsing, and supports sophisticated analysis. JSON has become the de facto standard for structured logs:

{"timestamp":"2024-01-15T10:32:45.123Z","level":"ERROR","service":"auth-service","event":"login_failed","user_id":"user_12345","ip_address":"192.168.1.100","reason":"invalid_credentials","attempt_count":3}

Structured logs allow you to query specific fields efficiently, aggregate by dimensions, and build dashboards without complex parsing logic. They also facilitate integration with security information and event management (SIEM) systems and other analysis tools.

Centralization and Aggregation

Distributed systems generate logs across numerous servers, containers, and services. Centralized log aggregation brings these disparate sources together, enabling unified search, correlation, and analysis. Common aggregation platforms include Elasticsearch-based stacks, cloud provider logging services, and specialized security platforms like Kusari for software supply chain visibility.

Centralization provides several benefits beyond convenience. It creates a single source of truth for security investigations, simplifies compliance reporting, enables cross-service correlation to identify cascading failures, and provides backup for logs even if source systems fail or get compromised.

‍

Definition of Logging in Software Supply Chain Security

Within software supply chain security specifically, logging takes on particular importance as it provides visibility into the provenance and integrity of software artifacts as they move through development pipelines. Software supply chain logging captures evidence of who built what code, when it was built, what dependencies were included, what security scans occurred, and how artifacts were deployed.

Organizations implementing frameworks like SLSA (Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts) rely heavily on logging to generate provenance metadata and attestations. These logs become the proof points that demonstrate secure development practices and help detect supply chain compromises.

Key Logging Requirements for Supply Chain Security

Software supply chain logging should capture:

• Source Code Events: Commits, merges, pull requests, and code reviews with contributor identities
• Build Process Activities: Build triggers, build environments, compilation parameters, and artifact generation
• Dependency Resolution: Which external packages were fetched, from where, and their integrity checksums
• Security Scanning Results: Vulnerability findings, license compliance checks, and static analysis outputs
• Artifact Signing: Who signed which artifacts, using what keys, and when
• Deployment Events: What versions were deployed where, by whom, and with what configurations
• Runtime Behavior: Unexpected process executions, network connections, or file modifications that might indicate compromise

Platforms like Kusari's supply chain security solution provide specialized logging capabilities that capture these events across your development pipeline and correlate them to identify security risks.

‍

Logging Best Practices for DevSecOps Teams

Implementing logging effectively requires following established best practices that balance security, performance, and usability considerations. DevSecOps teams should adopt these guidelines to maximize the value of their logging investments while avoiding common pitfalls.

What to Log and What Not to Log

Determining appropriate logging scope prevents both security gaps and compliance violations. Always log security-relevant events including authentication attempts, authorization decisions, configuration changes, administrative actions, data access patterns, and security policy violations. These events provide the audit trail necessary for incident response and forensic analysis.

Never log sensitive information including passwords, API keys, tokens, credit card numbers, social security numbers, or other personally identifiable information (PII). Accidentally logging sensitive data creates security vulnerabilities and compliance violations that can be worse than not logging at all. Implement sanitization functions that automatically redact sensitive patterns before logging.

Correlation Identifiers and Distributed Tracing

Modern applications span multiple services and systems, making it difficult to track individual requests or user sessions across components. Implement correlation IDs (also called trace IDs or request IDs) that propagate through your entire stack. When a user initiates an action, generate a unique identifier and include it in all log entries related to that transaction.

Correlation identifiers transform disconnected log entries into connected narratives. When investigating an issue, you can filter all logs by a specific correlation ID to see the complete end-to-end flow, regardless of how many services were involved. This capability becomes invaluable for troubleshooting complex interactions and understanding attack chains during security incidents.

Performance Considerations and Asynchronous Logging

Logging shouldn't significantly impact application performance. Synchronous logging operations that write directly to disk or network can create latency and reduce throughput. Implement asynchronous logging patterns that queue log entries in memory and batch-write them in background threads.

Balance logging verbosity against performance and storage costs. Debug-level logging in production environments can generate massive data volumes that overwhelm storage systems and make finding relevant information difficult. Use dynamic log level adjustment capabilities that let you temporarily increase verbosity for specific services when troubleshooting without permanently enabling excessive logging.

Log Retention and Lifecycle Management

Different log types have different retention requirements based on regulatory obligations, operational needs, and security value. Security and audit logs typically require longer retention periods (often 1-7 years) than application debug logs (perhaps 30-90 days).

Implement tiered storage strategies that move older logs to less expensive storage media while maintaining searchability. Consider archiving very old logs to compressed formats or cold storage for compliance while removing them from active search systems. Document your retention policies and automate enforcement to prevent both premature deletion and excessive storage costs.

‍

How to Use Logging for Security Monitoring and Threat Detection

Logging provides the raw data that feeds security monitoring, threat detection, and incident response capabilities. Properly configured logging enables security teams to identify malicious activities, investigate incidents, and demonstrate compliance with security policies.

Security Event Identification

Security-relevant events require special attention in logging configurations. These events serve as indicators of compromise or policy violations that demand investigation. Key security events include:

• Failed authentication attempts, especially repeated failures from the same source
• Privilege escalation activities or attempts to access unauthorized resources
• Configuration changes to security controls, firewalls, or access policies
• Unexpected network connections to unknown external hosts
• File integrity violations or modifications to critical system files
• Unusual patterns in API usage or database queries
• Security tool alerts from vulnerability scanners, intrusion detection systems, or malware detection

Modern security operations centers (SOCs) build detection rules that analyze logs in real-time to identify these patterns. When suspicious patterns emerge, automated alerting notifies security analysts for investigation.

Log Analysis Techniques

Raw logs require analysis to extract security insights. Several techniques help identify threats buried in log data:

Pattern Recognition: Identify known attack signatures, such as SQL injection attempts in web logs or credential stuffing patterns in authentication logs. Regular expressions and signature matching detect these patterns automatically.

Anomaly Detection: Establish baselines for normal behavior and alert on deviations. Machine learning models can identify unusual access patterns, abnormal data volumes, or atypical user behaviors that might indicate compromise.

Correlation Analysis: Connect related events across multiple sources to identify attack chains. A single failed login might be benign, but failed logins from multiple accounts followed by successful administrative access could indicate credential stuffing followed by privilege escalation.

Time-Series Analysis: Track metrics over time to identify trends, spikes, or drops that indicate problems. Sudden increases in error rates or traffic volumes might signal attacks or system failures.

Integration with SIEM Systems

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platforms aggregate logs from across your environment and apply correlation rules to detect complex attack patterns. SIEM systems ingest logs from applications, infrastructure, security tools, and network devices, normalizing them into common formats and applying threat intelligence.

For organizations focused on software supply chain security, specialized platforms like Kusari provide supply-chain-specific threat detection that understands the unique risks in development pipelines, such as compromised dependencies, unauthorized code changes, or suspicious build activities.

‍

Logging Compliance and Regulatory Requirements

Many regulatory frameworks mandate specific logging practices to demonstrate security controls, enable investigations, and provide accountability. Organizations operating in regulated industries must ensure their logging implementations meet these requirements or face penalties.

Common Compliance Frameworks

Various regulations impose logging requirements:

• SOC 2: Requires logging of system activities, security events, and access to customer data with appropriate retention periods
• PCI DSS: Mandates logging and monitoring of all access to cardhality holder data, with specific requirements for log review frequency and retention
• HIPAA: Requires audit logs for healthcare information systems tracking who accessed protected health information
• GDPR: Mandates logging of data processing activities and requires organizations to detect and report data breaches
• SOX: Requires audit trails for financial systems showing who made what changes to financial data

Audit Trail Requirements

Compliance-focused logging creates audit trails that answer key questions: who did what, when, where, and with what result. These audit trails must be tamper-evident, meaning unauthorized modifications should be detectable. Implement log integrity mechanisms such as cryptographic hashing, write-once storage, or blockchain-based verification to prove logs haven't been altered.

Audit logs should capture sufficient context to understand actions without ambiguity. Rather than logging "user updated record," log "user john.smith@example.com updated customer record ID 12345, changing email address from old@example.com to new@example.com, from IP address 192.168.1.50 at 2024-01-15T14:23:45Z." This level of detail supports investigations and demonstrates compliance during audits.

‍

Challenges and Common Logging Pitfalls

Despite its importance, logging implementations frequently encounter challenges that reduce effectiveness. Understanding these pitfalls helps teams avoid them and build more robust logging capabilities.

Log Volume and Storage Costs

Modern systems generate enormous log volumes, especially at debug or trace levels. Excessive logging creates storage costs, impacts search performance, and makes finding relevant information difficult—like searching for needles in haystacks. Teams must balance completeness against practicality, logging enough to maintain visibility without drowning in data.

Implement sampling strategies for high-volume, low-value logs. You might log every error but only sample 1% of successful transactions. Use dynamic log levels that increase verbosity only for specific users, transactions, or time periods when troubleshooting specific issues.

Insufficient Context

Logs that lack context create mysteries rather than providing insights. An error message "database connection failed" without information about which database, which application component, what user or transaction was affected, or environmental conditions makes troubleshooting difficult. Every log entry should include sufficient context to understand what happened without consulting other sources.

Add contextual metadata automatically through logging frameworks. Include service identifiers, versions, environment names (production, staging), host identifiers, and correlation IDs by default so developers don't need to remember to add them manually.

Security Risks from Logging

Logging creates security risks when implemented poorly. Logs containing sensitive data become targets for attackers. Logs stored insecurely can be modified to hide attack evidence. Excessive logging might impact performance enough to create denial-of-service vulnerabilities.

Secure your logging infrastructure with the same rigor as production systems. Encrypt logs in transit and at rest. Implement strong access controls limiting who can view, search, or modify logs. Monitor logging systems themselves for compromise attempts. Regular audit your log content to verify sensitive data isn't being captured inadvertently.

Alert Fatigue

Organizations that configure alerts for every possible issue quickly experience alert fatigue—when too many alerts cause teams to ignore them all. Not every log entry warrants immediate notification. Tune alerting thresholds to focus on high-severity, actionable issues while aggregating lower-priority items into periodic reports.

Implement alert escalation policies that increase notification urgency based on severity and response time. Create runbooks that guide responders through investigation steps when alerts fire. Continuously refine alert rules based on false positive rates and investigation outcomes.

‍

Securing Your Software Supply Chain with Comprehensive Logging

Software supply chain attacks represent one of the fastest-growing threat vectors, with adversaries compromising development tools, injecting malicious code into dependencies, or tampering with build processes. Comprehensive logging throughout your software development lifecycle provides the visibility needed to detect and respond to these sophisticated attacks.

Kusari specializes in software supply chain security, providing logging and monitoring capabilities specifically designed for development pipelines. By capturing detailed provenance information, tracking dependencies, monitoring build integrity, and correlating events across your toolchain, Kusari helps security and DevSecOps teams identify supply chain compromises before they reach production.

Organizations serious about securing their software supply chains need logging that goes beyond traditional application monitoring. You need visibility into code repositories, build systems, artifact registries, deployment pipelines, and runtime environments—with the ability to correlate events across these disparate sources to identify attack chains.

Learn how Kusari can enhance your software supply chain security posture with comprehensive logging and threat detection capabilities. Schedule a demo to see how specialized supply chain logging protects your development pipelines and helps you achieve compliance with frameworks like SLSA and SSDF.

‍

What Are the Primary Benefits of Implementing Comprehensive Logging?

The primary benefits of implementing comprehensive logging span security, operations, and compliance domains. Logging provides the visibility foundation that enables organizations to understand system behavior, detect anomalies, troubleshoot issues, and demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements.

From a security perspective, logging enables threat detection by capturing evidence of malicious activities such as unauthorized access attempts, privilege escalation, data exfiltration, or configuration tampering. Security teams rely on log analysis to identify incidents, investigate breaches, and understand attack methodologies. Without comprehensive logging, organizations operate blind to security events occurring within their systems.

Operationally, logging supports troubleshooting by providing historical records that help teams understand what led to failures or performance degradations. When applications behave unexpectedly, logs show the sequence of events, error conditions, and environmental factors that contributed to problems. This diagnostic capability reduces mean time to resolution and prevents prolonged outages.

For compliance purposes, logging creates audit trails that demonstrate adherence to security policies and regulatory requirements. Auditors reviewing security controls expect to see evidence of who accessed systems, what changes were made, and how security events were handled. Comprehensive logging provides this evidence and helps organizations avoid penalties for compliance failures.

Logging also supports business analytics by capturing transaction data, user behaviors, and system performance metrics that inform product decisions and optimization efforts. Product teams analyze logs to understand feature usage, identify bottlenecks, and measure business outcomes.

‍

How Do I Determine Appropriate Log Retention Periods?

Determining appropriate log retention periods requires balancing regulatory requirements, security needs, operational value, and storage costs. Log retention policies should reflect the different purposes various log types serve and the timeframes over which they remain useful.

Start by identifying regulatory requirements that mandate minimum retention periods for your industry and geography. Financial services regulations often require multi-year retention of audit logs. Healthcare regulations specify minimum retention for logs containing protected health information access records. Compliance frameworks like PCI DSS mandate at least one year of immediately available audit logs with three months of historical data. Document these requirements and treat them as minimum baselines that cannot be reduced.

Beyond compliance minimums, consider security investigation needs. Security incidents often aren't discovered immediately, sometimes remaining undetected for months. Retaining security-relevant logs for extended periods (12-24 months or longer) enables retrospective analysis when breaches are eventually discovered. Security teams need sufficient history to understand attack timelines, identify initial compromise vectors, and determine what data was accessed.

Operational logs typically have shorter useful lifespans. Application debug logs might only remain relevant for 30-90 days since older entries rarely help troubleshoot current issues. Performance metrics might be aggregated and downsampled over time, retaining high-resolution data for recent periods while keeping only hourly or daily summaries for older data.

Storage costs influence retention decisions. High-volume logs can become expensive to retain indefinitely. Implement tiered storage strategies that move older logs to less expensive storage media while maintaining searchability when needed. Archive very old logs to compressed formats or cold storage for compliance while removing them from active search indices.

Document your retention policies formally, specifying retention periods for each log category, storage tier transitions, and deletion procedures. Automate retention enforcement through lifecycle policies that move or delete data based on age without manual intervention. Review policies periodically to ensure they continue meeting evolving needs.

‍

What Information Should Never Be Included in Logs?

Several categories of information should never be included in logs due to security risks, privacy concerns, and compliance requirements. Logging sensitive data creates vulnerabilities where credentials could be stolen, privacy regulations violated, or compliance frameworks breached.

Never log authentication credentials including passwords, password hashes, API keys, access tokens, OAuth tokens, session identifiers, or private keys. Even seemingly innocuous information like password lengths or character types shouldn't appear in logs as they aid brute-force attacks. Instead, log authentication events (success or failure) without including the credentials themselves. Replace sensitive values with hashes or tokens that enable correlation without exposing actual values.

Payment card information must not appear in logs. PCI DSS explicitly prohibits logging full primary account numbers (PANs), card verification codes (CVV/CVC), or PIN data. Even truncated card numbers should be limited to the first six and last four digits. Financial information like bank account numbers, routing numbers, or transaction details should be carefully controlled in logs.

Personally identifiable information (PII) requires careful handling in logs. Regulations like GDPR restrict processing and storage of personal data. Avoid logging full names, addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, social security numbers, dates of birth, or other information that could identify individuals. When you must log events involving specific users, use anonymized identifiers or hashed values rather than direct PII.

Health information protected under HIPAA shouldn't appear in logs without appropriate safeguards. Medical record numbers, diagnosis codes, treatment information, and similar data require restricted access and encryption. If health-related logs are necessary, implement additional access controls and encryption specific to those logs.

Business confidential information like proprietary algorithms, trade secrets, competitive intelligence, or sensitive business metrics should be carefully controlled. While organizations own these logs, inadvertent exposure through compromised logging systems or overly broad access could harm competitive position.

Implement automatic sanitization functions within logging frameworks that detect and redact sensitive patterns before writing logs. Regular expressions can identify credit card numbers, social security numbers, email addresses, and similar patterns. Hash functions can replace sensitive values with consistent but non-reversible identifiers. Train development teams on secure logging practices and conduct regular audits of log content to verify compliance.

‍

How Does Logging Support Incident Response and Forensic Analysis?

Logging provides the evidentiary foundation for incident response and forensic analysis, enabling security teams to understand what happened during security incidents, identify attack vectors, determine scope of compromise, and prevent recurrence. Comprehensive logs transform reactive investigation into data-driven analysis that answers critical questions about security events.

During incident response, logs serve as the primary source of truth about system activities and user behaviors. When security alerts indicate potential compromise, responders immediately examine logs to validate whether real incidents occurred or alerts represent false positives. Logs show exactly what actions were performed, by whom (or what process), when they occurred, from where they originated, and what results they produced.

Forensic analysis relies on logs to construct attack timelines that show how incidents unfolded from initial compromise through lateral movement to final objectives. Investigators trace attacker activities by following log entries showing reconnaissance activities, exploitation attempts, privilege escalation, data access, and exfiltration. Correlation IDs linking related events across systems enable investigators to follow attack chains even as they cross service boundaries.

Logs help determine breach scope by showing what systems were accessed, what data was viewed or exfiltrated, and what modifications were made. This information drives notification requirements, enables containment decisions, and informs remediation efforts. Without comprehensive logs, organizations struggle to confidently answer "what data was compromised?"—a question regulators and customers rightfully demand answers to.

Root cause analysis depends on logs showing not just what happened but why it was allowed to happen. Logs reveal security control failures, misconfigurations, or policy violations that enabled incidents. Understanding root causes enables organizations to fix underlying issues rather than just addressing symptoms, preventing similar incidents in the future.

For legal proceedings or regulatory investigations, logs provide admissible evidence when properly preserved and authenticated. Tamper-evident logging mechanisms prove log integrity, demonstrating logs haven't been altered since events occurred. Chain of custody documentation tracks who accessed investigation materials and when, maintaining evidentiary value.

Organizations should develop incident response playbooks that specify what logs to examine for different incident types, how to collect and preserve evidence, and what analysis techniques to apply. Practice incident response through tabletop exercises and simulations that test whether logging provides sufficient information to conduct effective investigations. Gaps identified during exercises should drive logging improvements before real incidents occur.

The software supply chain presents unique incident response challenges since compromises might occur in development systems, build pipelines, or dependencies rather than production environments. Specialized logging for development workflows, as provided by platforms like Kusari, ensures security teams have visibility into supply chain compromises and can investigate suspicious activities in CI/CD pipelines just as thoroughly as they investigate production incidents.

‍

Building Resilient Systems Through Strategic Logging

Organizations that view logging as a strategic capability rather than an afterthought build more resilient systems, respond more effectively to incidents, and demonstrate stronger security postures. The investment in comprehensive logging infrastructure, standardized practices, and automated analysis capabilities pays dividends across security, operations, and compliance domains.

Effective logging doesn't happen accidentally—it requires deliberate architecture, clear standards, appropriate tooling, and ongoing refinement. DevSecOps teams must advocate for logging investments, educate developers on secure logging practices, and continuously improve logging capabilities based on lessons learned from incidents and operations.

As software supply chains become increasingly complex and attackers target development infrastructure, logging that spans from code commit through production deployment becomes critical. Organizations need visibility into every stage of software development and delivery to detect sophisticated supply chain attacks before they impact customers.

The journey toward comprehensive logging begins with assessment of current capabilities, identification of gaps, and incremental improvements that address highest-priority needs first. Start with security-critical systems and high-risk areas, ensuring those generate comprehensive logs before expanding to lower-priority systems. Build centralized aggregation infrastructure that can scale as logging coverage expands. Develop analysis capabilities that extract value from collected logs rather than letting them sit unused in storage.

Logging represents a fundamental security control that enables detection, investigation, and compliance—making it worthy of strategic investment and continuous attention. Organizations that master logging gain visibility advantages over attackers and operational insights that drive continuous improvement. Those that neglect logging operate blind, discovering problems only after significant damage occurs. The difference in security outcomes and operational excellence between these approaches makes logging one of the highest-return security investments organizations can make.